
You need to assess candidates. Two popular tests dominate the market. One is a party trick. The other predicts performance. Which one are you using?
Hiring the wrong person costs time and money. You need more than a resume. Soft skills, collaboration, emotional stability – these predict performance. But how do you measure them?
Personality tests promise answers. The two most common are the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Big Five model. Both claim to reveal who a candidate really is. Yet only one has the scientific backing to support hiring decisions.
Here is the uncomfortable truth: most HR teams still use tools that are no better than horoscopes. They label people as "INTJ" or "ENFP" and assume they know how that person will behave at work. They don't.
Point cle : Personality tests used in recruitment must be reliable and valid. The MBTI fails both tests. The Big Five passes them.
The MBTI sorts people into 16 types based on four dichotomies: Introversion/Extraversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, Judging/Perceiving. It sounds neat. It is not.
Studies show that 50 % of people get a different type when they retake the test after only five weeks. That is not a personality test. That is a mood ring. A reliable test should give the same result over months or years.
The MBTI was developed by a mother-daughter team with no formal training in psychometrics. It was never validated against job performance. And yet it remains the most widely used personality assessment in corporate training and coaching.
"Less than 1 % of academic studies on personality use the MBTI. The scientific community has moved on." – Source: Test-personnalite.app, 2023
Three reasons. First, it is easy to remember. "I'm an INTJ" sounds like a badge. Second, it feels positive. Every type has strengths. Nobody is "bad". That sells well in training. Third, it is cheap and quick. But cheap tools produce cheap results.
The Big Five (also called OCEAN) measures five continuous dimensions: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (or Emotional Stability). It is the result of decades of peer-reviewed research.
Test-retest reliability for Big Five scales is 0.80 to 0.90 over months or years. That means you get the same result almost every time. That is what you need for hiring decisions.
The Big Five predicts job performance better than any other personality model. A meta-analysis of over 200 studies found that Conscientiousness alone correlates with performance across nearly all occupations. Emotional Stability predicts teamwork. Extraversion predicts sales success.
Attention : Not all Big Five tests are equal. Free online versions may lack proper norms and reliability. Use validated professional tools like Sigmund's personality test to ensure accuracy.
In a 2018 study from CLiC-it, researchers compared AI models trained to predict personality from Facebook data using MBTI labels versus Big Five labels. The Big Five models were more informative, but MBTI labels sometimes gave higher classification accuracy – because they are simpler. That simplicity is deceptive. You lose nuance.
Another source, PerformanSe, notes that Big Five coefficients of internal reliability are consistently above 0.80. They conclude that for structured professional contexts, the Big Five is "objectively more suitable" than MBTI.
| Criterion | MBTI | Big Five |
|---|---|---|
| Number of traits | 4 dichotomies → 16 types | 5 continuous dimensions |
| Test-retest reliability | ~0.50 (50% change in 5 weeks) | 0.80–0.90 |
| Scientific support | <1% of academic studies | Dominant model in research |
| Predicts job performance? | No | Yes (especially Conscientiousness) |
| Use in HR | Common in training, low hiring validity | Preferred for selection and development |
Ask yourself: are you using a test that is scientifically validated? If your tool is based on MBTI, you are flying blind. The data does not support it.
You have a choice. You can keep using a test that 50 % of people fail to repeat within a month. Or you can switch to a model that actually predicts who will succeed in your team.
Here is a simple checklist to audit your current personality assessment:
One more thing: the Big Five is not just for selection. It helps with team building, coaching, and leadership development. It gives you a shared language without boxing people into stereotypes.
At Sigmund, we built our assessments on the Big Five model. Why? Because we care about results, not labels. Our personality test delivers reliable scores on all five dimensions, backed by normative data from thousands of professionals.
We also offer a full catalogue of validated assessments for different HR needs – from hiring to succession planning. Every test is designed to give you clear, actionable insights.
Stop guessing. Start measuring. Explore our HR assessments
Or if you prefer, read more about the science behind personality testing on our HR news page.
Key takeaway from the research: The MBTI captures personality dimensions already measured more accurately by the Big Five. The Big Five model shows superior reliability (0.80–0.90) and better prediction of job performance, academic success, and team dynamics. The evidence is clear—stop relying on binary labels. Start using continuous, validated traits.
A 2023 literature review of 14 empirical studies confirmed the Big Five’s broader and more rigorous application in formal contexts (education, research, corporate). Correlations between MBTI scales and Big Five factors exceed 0.50. For example, Extraversion/Introversion maps directly to Extraversion. Sensing/Intuition maps to Openness. MBTI offers no unique structural dimension.
The Big Five measures observable, conscious traits on a continuum. No forced choices. No dichotomies. This means you get granular data, not a static label. And you can compare candidates objectively.
Hard truth: Many free MBTI questionnaires show reliability below 0.70. A professional Big Five test (like SIGMUND’s) stays above 0.80. You wouldn’t hire candidates using a broken scale. Why use a broken personality test?
Stop the debate. Start applying what the science says. Here is a concrete checklist for HR professionals:
“The MBTI is useful for self-reflection and informal exploration. But when you need to predict who will succeed in a role, the Big Five is the gold standard. It’s not about which test is more popular—it’s about which one works.”
The Big Five framework adapts to every HR need. Use it for recruitment, team composition, leadership development, and coaching. Each trait gives you actionable insight:
You can benchmark your current team against these dimensions. Then define ideal trait ranges for each position. This transforms hiring from a guess into a science.
SIGMUND’s personality test uses the Big Five model with no shortcuts. Every candidate receives a transparent, percentile-based report. No vague descriptions. No “types.” Just clear data you can act on.
Take the first step. Explore our full test catalogue to see how each assessment maps to real job requirements. Or go deeper into our standalone personality test to understand the traits that matter most for your roles.
Decouvrez les tests d'evaluation SIGMUND -- objectifs, scientifiques, immediatement actionnables.
Decouvrir les testsDiscover our comprehensive range of scientifically validated psychometric tests